Neovim for Go Backend Development: Monorepo, Microservices, Infrastructure
A comprehensive guide to mastering Neovim for large-scale Go backend development. Navigate monorepos, manage microservices, mix Go with infrastructure-as-code, and orchestrate multiple languages seamlessly. Learn how senior Go engineers use Neovim for complex distributed systems.
Neovim for Go Backend Development: Monorepo, Microservices, Infrastructure
Managing Complex Go Systems: From Monorepos to Distributed Infrastructure
π― Introduction: The Complexity of Modern Go Development
Let me start with an honest observation: Most Go developers are building more complex systems than they realize.
Theyβre not just writing Go services. Theyβre orchestrating:
- Multiple services (authentication, payments, notifications, worker queues)
- Multiple languages (Go for services, Bash for scripts, Python for utilities, YAML for configs)
- Infrastructure-as-code (Terraform, Kubernetes manifests, Docker configs)
- Multiple repositories or monorepo structure (dependencies, shared packages, service boundaries)
- Complex workflows (local development, CI/CD, staging, production deployment)
Traditional IDEs (GoLand, VS Code) struggle here because:
β Monorepo navigation becomes sluggish
β Multiple language support requires 20+ extensions
β LSP coordination across Go, YAML, Terraform, Bash is messy
β Context switching between services kills focus
β GUI overhead becomes noticeable in large projects
β Resource usage balloons with multiple services running
Neovim, designed for exactly this scenario, excels.
What This Guide Is About
This is not βlearn Go in Neovimβ or βbasic Neovim setup.β
This is: How to use Neovim as your central hub for complex Go backend systems, from monorepo navigation to infrastructure orchestration.
We will cover:
β
Monorepo organization - Navigate 50+ services efficiently
β
Multi-module workspaces - Go workspaces in Neovim
β
LSP coordination - gopls + terraform-ls + yamlls + bashls
β
Service navigation - Jump between services instantly
β
Integrated workflows - Edit code β run tests β deploy
β
Mixed-language projects - Go + Terraform + YAML + Bash
β
Debugging distributed systems - Delve across multiple services
β
Profiling at scale - Performance analysis on complex systems
β
Team workflows - Sharing Neovim configs across teams
The perspective: How a senior Go engineer thinks about editor infrastructure for complex systems.
ποΈ Part 1: Understanding Monorepo Architecture in Neovim
Before configuring Neovim, understand what youβre building.
Monorepo Structure
A typical Go backend monorepo looks like:
backend-platform/
βββ go.work # Go workspace file
βββ services/
β βββ auth-service/
β β βββ go.mod
β β βββ main.go
β β βββ handlers/
β β βββ models/
β β βββ tests/
β β βββ Dockerfile
β βββ api-gateway/
β β βββ go.mod
β β βββ main.go
β β βββ ...
β βββ payment-service/
β βββ notification-service/
β βββ worker-service/
βββ shared/
β βββ go.mod
β βββ models/
β βββ database/
β βββ auth/
β βββ utils/
βββ infrastructure/
β βββ terraform/
β β βββ main.tf
β β βββ aws/
β β βββ kubernetes/
β β βββ modules/
β βββ kubernetes/
β β βββ base/
β β βββ overlays/
β β βββ manifests/
β βββ docker/
βββ scripts/
β βββ deploy.sh
β βββ setup-local.sh
β βββ run-tests.sh
β βββ migrate-db.sh
βββ docs/
βββ Makefile
The Challenge
Traditional IDE approach:
- Open GoLand project at root
- Try to navigate to auth-service
- IDE indexes entire monorepo
- Takes 30+ seconds to load
- Every file change triggers full re-index
- Opening second service requires new IDE window
- Context switching is painful
Neovim approach:
- Start Neovim at root
- Neovim knows go.work structure
- gopls understands module boundaries
- Navigate between services instantly
- Edit code, run tests, deploy all in terminal
- All in one cohesive workflow
π Part 2: Go Workspace Management in Neovim
Go 1.18 introduced workspaces. This is how you leverage them in Neovim.
Go Workspace Configuration
# backend-platform/go.work
go 1.21
use (
./services/auth-service
./services/api-gateway
./services/payment-service
./services/notification-service
./services/worker-service
./shared
)
This tells go that all these modules are part of the same workspace. Neovimβs gopls understands this:
When editing: services/auth-service/handlers/auth.go
gopls can:
- Find definition in shared/ package
- Refactor shared code atomically
- Run tests across all modules
- Update imports across modules
Neovim Configuration for Workspaces
-- ~/.config/nvim/lua/go-workspace.lua
local lspconfig = require('lspconfig')
lspconfig.gopls.setup({
cmd = { 'gopls', 'serve' },
filetypes = { 'go', 'gomod', 'gowork', 'gotmpl' },
-- Find workspace root
root_dir = function(fname)
local go_root = lspconfig.util.root_pattern(
'go.work', -- Check for go.work first (workspace)
'go.mod', -- Fall back to go.mod (single module)
'.git' -- Fall back to git root
)(fname)
return go_root
end,
on_attach = function(client, bufnr)
local opts = { noremap = true, silent = true, buffer = bufnr }
-- Workspace-aware keybindings
vim.keymap.set('n', 'gd', vim.lsp.buf.definition, opts) -- Definition
vim.keymap.set('n', 'gi', vim.lsp.buf.implementation, opts) -- Implementation
vim.keymap.set('n', 'gr', vim.lsp.buf.references, opts) -- All references
vim.keymap.set('n', 'K', vim.lsp.buf.hover, opts) -- Documentation
vim.keymap.set('n', '<leader>rn', vim.lsp.buf.rename, opts) -- Rename atomically
vim.keymap.set('n', '<leader>ca', vim.lsp.buf.code_action, opts) -- Code actions
end,
capabilities = require('cmp_nvim_lsp').default_capabilities(),
settings = {
gopls = {
-- Enable workspace-wide analysis
analysisProgressReporting = true,
staticcheck = true,
usePlaceholders = true,
completeUnimported = true,
-- Code lenses (show test coverage, benchmarks)
codelens = {
generate = true,
test = true,
gc_details = true,
},
-- Inlay hints for types
hints = {
assignVariableTypes = true,
compositeLiteralFields = true,
compositeLiteralTypes = true,
constantValues = true,
functionTypeParameters = true,
parameterNames = true,
rangeVariableTypes = true,
},
-- Diagnostic settings
diagnosticsDelay = '100ms',
analysisDelay = '500ms',
},
},
})
Navigating Between Services
-- ~/.config/nvim/lua/go-monorepo-nav.lua
-- List all services in workspace
vim.api.nvim_create_user_command('GoServices', function()
vim.cmd(':Telescope find_files cwd=services')
end, { desc = 'Find files in services/' })
-- Quick jump to service
vim.api.nvim_create_user_command('GoService', function(opts)
local service = opts.args
vim.cmd(':edit services/' .. service .. '/main.go')
end, {
nargs = 1,
complete = function()
-- Auto-complete service names
local services = vim.fn.glob('services/*/main.go', false, true)
local names = {}
for _, path in ipairs(services) do
local service_name = path:match('services/([^/]+)/')
table.insert(names, service_name)
end
return names
end,
desc = 'Jump to service main.go',
})
-- Jump to shared package
vim.api.nvim_create_user_command('GoShared', function(opts)
local package = opts.args or ''
vim.cmd(':edit shared/' .. package)
end, { nargs = '?', desc = 'Jump to shared package' })
-- List all packages in workspace
vim.api.nvim_create_user_command('GoPackages', function()
vim.cmd(':Telescope live_grep cwd=.')
end, { desc = 'Search packages in workspace' })
Usage:
:GoService auth-service β Open auth-service/main.go
:GoService payment-service β Open payment-service/main.go
:GoShared models β Open shared/models
:GoServices β Find files in all services
:GoPackages β Search across entire workspace
π Part 3: Cross-Service Refactoring and Navigation
The real power of Neovim + Go workspaces is atomic cross-service refactoring.
Refactoring Shared Code
Scenario:
You have a shared payment model used by multiple services:
shared/models/payment.go β Defines Payment type
services/payment-service/... β Uses Payment
services/api-gateway/... β Uses Payment
services/billing-service/... β Uses Payment
You need to rename Payment.Amount β Payment.AmountCents:
Workflow:
1. Open shared/models/payment.go
vim shared/models/payment.go
2. Position cursor on 'Amount' field
3. Rename across entire workspace
<leader>rn
4. gopls finds ALL references across all services
- Updates payment-service
- Updates api-gateway
- Updates billing-service
- Updates all tests
- All atomically
5. No manual search/replace needed
Finding Implementations
Scenario:
You have an interface PaymentProcessor:
shared/payments/processor.go β Defines interface
services/payment-service/... β Implements via Stripe
services/billing-service/... β Implements via PayPal
Find all implementations:
vim shared/payments/processor.go
# Cursor on 'PaymentProcessor' interface
:Telescope lsp_implementations
# Shows:
# - StripeProcessor (payment-service)
# - PayPalProcessor (billing-service)
# - MockProcessor (tests)
Dependency Analysis
-- ~/.config/nvim/lua/go-dependencies.lua
-- Show who imports this package
vim.api.nvim_create_user_command('GoImporters', function()
vim.lsp.buf.references(nil, { on_list = function(options)
vim.fn.setloclist(0, options.items)
vim.cmd('lopen')
end })
end, { desc = 'Show all packages importing this' })
-- Show what this package imports
vim.api.nvim_create_user_command('GoImports', function()
vim.cmd(':terminal go list -f "{{join .Imports \\\"\\n\\\"}}" ./...')
end, { desc = 'Show imports for current package' })
-- Visualize module dependency graph
vim.api.nvim_create_user_command('GoDependencyGraph', function()
vim.cmd(':terminal go mod graph | head -20')
end, { desc = 'Show dependency graph' })
π Part 4: LSP Coordination Across Multiple Languages
Real backend systems use multiple languages. Neovim handles this elegantly.
Multi-Language LSP Setup
-- ~/.config/nvim/after/plugin/lspconfig-multi.lua
local lspconfig = require('lspconfig')
-- Go
lspconfig.gopls.setup({
-- ... go config from earlier
})
-- Terraform (infrastructure code)
lspconfig.terraformls.setup({
cmd = { 'terraform-ls', 'serve' },
filetypes = { 'terraform', 'tf' },
root_dir = lspconfig.util.root_pattern('.terraform', '.git'),
single_file_support = true,
})
-- YAML (Kubernetes manifests, Docker compose)
lspconfig.yamlls.setup({
settings = {
yaml = {
schemas = {
kubernetes = 'infrastructure/kubernetes/**/*.yaml',
docker = 'docker-compose.yaml',
github = '.github/workflows/*.yaml',
},
format = { enable = true },
validate = true,
},
},
})
-- Bash/Shell (deployment scripts)
lspconfig.bashls.setup({
filetypes = { 'sh', 'bash' },
})
-- JSON (configs, manifests)
lspconfig.jsonls.setup({
settings = {
json = {
schemas = {
{
fileMatch = { 'go.mod' },
url = 'schema://go.mod',
},
},
},
},
})
-- Lua (Neovim config)
lspconfig.lua_ls.setup({
settings = {
Lua = {
runtime = { version = 'LuaJIT' },
diagnostics = { globals = { 'vim' } },
workspace = {
library = vim.api.nvim_get_runtime_file('', true),
},
},
},
})
Language-Aware Keybindings
-- ~/.config/nvim/lua/go-mixed-languages.lua
-- Detect file type and run appropriate tools
local function smart_format()
local filetype = vim.bo.filetype
local opts = { noremap = true, silent = true }
if filetype == 'go' then
vim.lsp.buf.format({ async = false })
elseif filetype == 'terraform' or filetype == 'tf' then
vim.cmd(':terminal terraform fmt %')
elseif filetype == 'yaml' then
vim.cmd(':terminal prettier --write %')
elseif filetype == 'json' then
vim.cmd(':terminal jq . % > %.tmp && mv %.tmp %')
elseif filetype == 'sh' or filetype == 'bash' then
vim.cmd(':terminal shfmt -i 2 -w %')
end
end
-- Smart validation
local function smart_validate()
local filetype = vim.bo.filetype
if filetype == 'go' then
vim.cmd(':terminal go vet ./...')
elseif filetype == 'terraform' then
vim.cmd(':terminal terraform validate')
elseif filetype == 'sh' then
vim.cmd(':terminal shellcheck %')
elseif filetype == 'yaml' then
vim.cmd(':terminal yamllint %')
end
end
-- Smart test runner
local function smart_test()
local filetype = vim.bo.filetype
if filetype == 'go' then
vim.cmd(':terminal go test -v ./...')
elseif filetype == 'terraform' then
vim.cmd(':terminal terraform plan')
elseif filetype == 'sh' then
vim.cmd(':terminal bash -n %')
end
end
vim.keymap.set('n', '<leader>f', smart_format, { noremap = true })
vim.keymap.set('n', '<leader>v', smart_validate, { noremap = true })
vim.keymap.set('n', '<leader>t', smart_test, { noremap = true })
π Part 5: Integrated Development Workflow (Local β CI/CD β Production)
A senior Go developer thinks in terms of workflows, not individual commands.
The Complete Development Cycle
-- ~/.config/nvim/lua/go-workflow.lua
local M = {}
-- Phase 1: Local Development
function M.local_dev()
print("Starting local development...")
vim.cmd(':terminal docker-compose up -d') -- Start services
vim.cmd(':terminal go run ./services/api-gateway/main.go')
end
-- Phase 2: Testing
function M.test_all()
print("Running full test suite...")
vim.cmd(':terminal go test -v -race -coverprofile=coverage.out ./...')
vim.cmd(':terminal go tool cover -html=coverage.out')
end
function M.test_current()
local file = vim.fn.expand('%')
vim.cmd(':terminal go test -v ' .. vim.fn.fnamemodify(file, ':h'))
end
-- Phase 3: Linting and Quality
function M.quality_check()
print("Running quality checks...")
vim.cmd(':terminal ' ..
'golangci-lint run ./... && ' ..
'go mod tidy && ' ..
'go vet ./...'
)
end
-- Phase 4: Build
function M.build_service()
local service = vim.fn.input('Service to build: ')
vim.cmd(':terminal go build -o bin/' .. service .. ' ./services/' .. service)
end
function M.build_docker()
local service = vim.fn.input('Service to docker: ')
vim.cmd(':terminal docker build -f docker/Dockerfile.' .. service .. ' -t ' .. service .. ':latest .')
end
-- Phase 5: Deploy
function M.deploy_staging()
print("Deploying to staging...")
vim.cmd(':terminal ' ..
'kubectl apply -f infrastructure/kubernetes/overlays/staging && ' ..
'kubectl rollout status deployment/api-gateway'
)
end
function M.deploy_production()
print("Deploying to production...")
vim.cmd(':terminal ' ..
'kubectl apply -f infrastructure/kubernetes/overlays/production && ' ..
'kubectl rollout status deployment/api-gateway'
)
end
-- Setup keybindings
vim.keymap.set('n', '<leader>wd', M.local_dev, { noremap = true, silent = true })
vim.keymap.set('n', '<leader>ta', M.test_all, { noremap = true, silent = true })
vim.keymap.set('n', '<leader>tc', M.test_current, { noremap = true, silent = true })
vim.keymap.set('n', '<leader>qc', M.quality_check, { noremap = true, silent = true })
vim.keymap.set('n', '<leader>bs', M.build_service, { noremap = true, silent = true })
vim.keymap.set('n', '<leader>bd', M.build_docker, { noremap = true, silent = true })
vim.keymap.set('n', '<leader>ds', M.deploy_staging, { noremap = true, silent = true })
vim.keymap.set('n', '<leader>dp', M.deploy_production, { noremap = true, silent = true })
return M
Complete Workflow:
Monday morning:
nvim backend-platform/
<leader>wd β Start all services locally
Edit code...
<leader>ta β Run full test suite
<leader>qc β Quality checks (lint, vet, tidy)
<leader>bs api-gateway β Build specific service
<leader>bd api-gateway β Build Docker image
<leader>ds β Deploy to staging
<leader>dp β Deploy to production
All without leaving Neovim
All with consistent keybindings
All integrated into one workflow
π Part 6: Debugging Distributed Systems
Debugging multi-service systems requires orchestrating Delve across services.
Setup Delve for Microservices
-- ~/.config/nvim/lua/go-debug-distributed.lua
local dap = require('dap')
local dapui = require('dapui')
-- Configure Delve
dap.adapters.go = {
type = 'executable',
command = 'dlv',
args = { 'dap' },
}
dap.configurations.go = {
-- Debug current service
{
type = 'go',
name = 'Debug Current Service',
mode = 'debug',
request = 'launch',
program = '${fileDirname}',
env = {},
args = {},
showLog = false,
},
-- Debug specific service
{
type = 'go',
name = 'Debug auth-service',
mode = 'debug',
request = 'launch',
program = '${workspaceFolder}/services/auth-service',
showLog = false,
},
{
type = 'go',
name = 'Debug api-gateway',
mode = 'debug',
request = 'launch',
program = '${workspaceFolder}/services/api-gateway',
showLog = false,
},
{
type = 'go',
name = 'Debug payment-service',
mode = 'debug',
request = 'launch',
program = '${workspaceFolder}/services/payment-service',
showLog = false,
},
-- Debug tests
{
type = 'go',
name = 'Debug Test',
mode = 'test',
request = 'launch',
program = '${fileDirname}',
args = { '-test.run', 'TestMyFunction' },
showLog = false,
},
-- Attach to running service
{
type = 'go',
name = 'Attach to Service',
mode = 'local',
request = 'attach',
processId = require('dap.utils').pick_process,
showLog = false,
},
}
-- DAP UI
dapui.setup()
dap.listeners.after.event_initialized['dapui_config'] = function()
dapui.open()
end
dap.listeners.before.event_terminated['dapui_config'] = function()
dapui.close()
end
-- Keybindings
vim.keymap.set('n', '<leader>db', dap.toggle_breakpoint, { noremap = true })
vim.keymap.set('n', '<leader>dc', dap.continue, { noremap = true })
vim.keymap.set('n', '<leader>dn', dap.step_over, { noremap = true })
vim.keymap.set('n', '<leader>di', dap.step_into, { noremap = true })
vim.keymap.set('n', '<leader>do', dap.step_out, { noremap = true })
vim.keymap.set('n', '<leader>dr', dap.repl.open, { noremap = true })
vim.keymap.set('n', '<leader>de', dapui.eval, { noremap = true })
Multi-Service Debugging Scenario
Scenario: API call from api-gateway β payment-service β shared/models
Setup:
1. Terminal 1: Neovim in api-gateway service
<leader>db β Set breakpoint in handler
<leader>dc β Start debugging
2. Terminal 2: Neovim in payment-service
<leader>db β Set breakpoint in processor
Open split terminal to watch logs
3. Make request:
curl http://localhost:8080/payments/process
4. Hit breakpoint in api-gateway
<leader>di β Step into payment-service
Hit breakpoint in payment-service
Inspect goroutine state, database queries, etc.
<leader>dr β Open REPL to inspect variables
All in Neovim, all coordinated
π Part 7: Performance Profiling at Scale
Goβs pprof is powerful. Neovim makes it accessible.
Profiling Integration
-- ~/.config/nvim/lua/go-profiling.lua
-- CPU Profiling
vim.api.nvim_create_user_command('GoProfile', function()
vim.cmd(':terminal ' ..
'go test -cpuprofile=cpu.prof ./... && ' ..
'go tool pprof -http=:8080 cpu.prof'
)
end, { desc = 'Run CPU profiling' })
-- Memory Profiling
vim.api.nvim_create_user_command('GoMemProfile', function()
vim.cmd(':terminal ' ..
'go test -memprofile=mem.prof ./... && ' ..
'go tool pprof -http=:8080 mem.prof'
)
end, { desc = 'Run memory profiling' })
-- Goroutine Analysis
vim.api.nvim_create_user_command('GoGoroutineProfile', function()
vim.cmd(':terminal ' ..
'go test -goroutineprofile=goroutine.prof ./... && ' ..
'go tool pprof -http=:8080 goroutine.prof'
)
end, { desc = 'Analyze goroutines' })
-- Benchmark with profiling
vim.api.nvim_create_user_command('GoBenchProfile', function(opts)
local pkg = opts.args or './...'
vim.cmd(':terminal ' ..
'go test -bench=. -benchmem -cpuprofile=bench_cpu.prof -memprofile=bench_mem.prof ' .. pkg
)
end, { nargs = '?', desc = 'Benchmark with profiling' })
-- Generate Flame Graph
vim.api.nvim_create_user_command('GoFlameGraph', function()
vim.cmd(':terminal ' ..
'go test -cpuprofile=cpu.prof ./... && ' ..
'go tool pprof -proto cpu.prof > cpu.pb.gz && ' ..
'go-torch --file=flame.svg cpu.prof'
)
end, { desc = 'Generate flame graph' })
π€ Part 8: Team Workflows and Shared Configuration
Large teams need consistent Neovim setups.
Distributing Neovim Config
# backend-platform/.nvim-config/init.lua
# Shared configuration in repository
# Team members clone and link:
# ln -s /path/to/backend-platform/.nvim-config ~/.config/nvim/projects/backend
-- ~/.config/nvim/init.lua
-- Personal config
-- Load project-specific config if exists
local project_config = vim.fn.expand('~/.config/nvim/projects/' ..
vim.fn.fnamemodify(vim.fn.getcwd(), ':t'))
if vim.fn.filereadable(project_config .. '/init.lua') == 1 then
dofile(project_config .. '/init.lua')
end
-- Load common team config
local team_config = vim.fn.findfile('.nvim-config/init.lua', '.;')
if team_config ~= '' then
dofile(team_config)
end
Team Conventions
-- backend-platform/.nvim-config/team-conventions.lua
-- All team members get same:
-- - LSP configurations
-- - Keybindings
-- - Go-specific settings
-- - Service navigation
local conventions = {
leader = ' ', -- Space bar
-- Go development
test_command = 'go test -v -race ./...',
lint_command = 'golangci-lint run ./...',
fmt_command = 'gofmt -w',
-- Service ports (documented)
services = {
['api-gateway'] = 8080,
['auth-service'] = 8081,
['payment-service'] = 8082,
},
-- Docker compose file location
docker_compose = 'docker-compose.yaml',
-- Kubernetes context for staging/prod
k8s_staging = 'staging-cluster',
k8s_prod = 'production-cluster',
}
return conventions
Makefile Integration
# backend-platform/Makefile
.PHONY: dev setup lint test build deploy-staging deploy-prod
# Development setup
dev:
@nvim
# Install dependencies
setup:
@go mod download
@cd services/auth-service && go mod download
@cd services/payment-service && go mod download
# Linting
lint:
@golangci-lint run ./...
# Testing
test:
@go test -v -race -coverprofile=coverage.out ./...
# Build all services
build:
@for service in auth payment api-gateway notification worker; do \
go build -o bin/$$service ./services/$$service-service; \
done
# Deploy to staging
deploy-staging:
@kubectl apply -f infrastructure/kubernetes/overlays/staging
# Deploy to production
deploy-prod:
@kubectl apply -f infrastructure/kubernetes/overlays/production
Usage from Neovim:
:terminal make test
:terminal make lint
:terminal make build
:terminal make deploy-staging
π― Part 9: Real-World Scenario: Building a Payment System
Letβs walk through a realistic complex system.
Project Structure
payment-platform/
βββ services/
β βββ api-gateway/ # HTTP entry point
β βββ payment-processor/ # Core payment logic
β βββ notification-service/ # Send confirmations
β βββ webhook-handler/ # External webhooks
βββ shared/
β βββ models/
β βββ database/
β βββ errors/
βββ infrastructure/
β βββ terraform/ # AWS infrastructure
β βββ kubernetes/ # K8s manifests
β βββ docker/ # Docker configs
βββ scripts/ # Deployment scripts
Development Workflow
Day 1: Adding Payment Method Support
Time: 09:00
Task: Add Apple Pay support
Step 1: Open Neovim
nvim payment-platform/
Step 2: Navigate to payment processor
:GoService payment-processor
Step 3: Examine PaymentMethod interface
shared/models/payment.go
<leader>rn β Find all implementations
# Shows: StripeProcessor, PayPalProcessor, ApplePayProcessor
Step 4: Create Apple Pay processor
services/payment-processor/applepay.go
gopls auto-completes interface methods:
- Process()
- Refund()
- Validate()
Step 5: Add to factory
services/payment-processor/factory.go
<leader>ca β Code action to add missing methods
Step 6: Write tests
services/payment-processor/applepay_test.go
Step 7: Run tests
<leader>ta β All tests pass
Step 8: Quality check
<leader>qc β Lint, vet, format
Step 9: Commit and push
<leader>gc β Git commit
11:30 - Done. Apple Pay support added.
Day 2: Debugging Webhook Failures
Time: 14:00
Issue: Webhooks failing silently
Step 1: Open webhook handler
:GoService webhook-handler
Step 2: Set breakpoint on webhook receiver
<leader>db β Toggle breakpoint
Step 3: Open second service (payment-processor)
Ctrl+w β :GoService payment-processor
Set breakpoint on processor
Step 4: Run test webhook
<leader>tc β Run webhook tests
Hit first breakpoint
Step 5: Step through code
<leader>dn β Step over
<leader>di β Step into payment-processor
Step 6: Inspect state
<leader>dr β REPL
> print(webhook.PaymentID)
> print(db.CheckPayment(webhook.PaymentID))
Step 7: Find root cause
Database connection string is old
Step 8: Fix and test
Edit config, <leader>ta
Tests pass
16:00 - Fixed
Day 3: Performance Optimization
Time: 10:00
Goal: Reduce payment processing latency
Step 1: Profile current performance
<leader>t β Run benchmarks
<leader>gb β Run with benchmarking
Step 2: Identify slow path
Terraform validation, database queries slow
Step 3: Open database layer
:GoShared database
Set up profiling:
<leader>profile
Step 4: Analyze results
go tool pprof identifies query bottleneck
Step 5: Add index to database
infrastructure/terraform/main.tf
<leader>f β Format terraform
<leader>v β Validate
Step 6: Re-benchmark
<leader>gb β 40% faster
Step 7: Deploy to staging
<leader>ds β Deploy changes
<leader>te β Test in staging
Step 8: Deploy to production
<leader>dp β Production deployment
Monitor metrics in split window
π Conclusion: Why Neovim Wins for Complex Go Systems
The Core Advantage
Traditional approach:
- Multiple IDE windows (one per service)
- Context switching between services
- LSP conflicts (which Go version? which module?)
- Manual coordination
- Resource heavy
Neovim approach:
- Single editor, entire workspace
- Atomic cross-service refactoring
- gopls understands workspace boundaries
- Coordinated LSPs
- Lightweight
The Scaling Argument
For 5-service monorepo:
GoLand/VS Code: Manageable but sluggish
For 20-service monorepo:
GoLand/VS Code: Slow, IDE overhead noticeable
For 50+ service monorepo:
GoLand/VS Code: Becomes liability
Neovim: Scales perfectly
The Integration Advantage
When youβre managing:
- Go services (50 files)
- Terraform infrastructure (20 files)
- Kubernetes manifests (30 files)
- Deployment scripts (10 files)
- Configuration (YAML, JSON)
Traditional IDEs need:
β Go extension
β Terraform extension
β Kubernetes extension
β YAML extension
β JSON extension
β Bash extension
6+ extensions, all trying to be main language
Conflicts between LSPs
Extension performance issues
Configuration fragmented
Neovim provides:
β gopls (Go)
β terraform-ls (Terraform)
β yamlls (YAML/Kubernetes)
β bashls (Shell scripts)
β jsonls (JSON configs)
All coordinated
All in one config file
All with same keybindings
The Senior Developer Perspective
A senior Go engineer working on complex systems asks:
"Can I refactor across all services atomically?"
Neovim: Yes (with go.work)
"Can I navigate 50 services without context switching?"
Neovim: Yes (with service commands)
"Can I debug across services?"
Neovim: Yes (Delve coordination)
"Can I mix Go, Terraform, YAML, Shell in one workflow?"
Neovim: Yes (LSP coordination)
"Does it scale to massive monorepos?"
Neovim: Yes (no GUI overhead)
"Can my team share configuration?"
Neovim: Yes (simple Lua, versioned in repo)
For complex Go systems, Neovim isnβt just an option.
Itβs the rational choice.
Tags
Related Articles
gRPC: The Complete Guide to Modern Service Communication
A comprehensive theoretical exploration of gRPC: what it is, how it works, when to use it, when to avoid it, its history, architecture, and why it has become the backbone of modern distributed systems.
Demystifying Push Notifications: The Complete Guide
A comprehensive theoretical exploration of push notifications: how they work, the infrastructure behind them, why mobile devices handle them so well, the services involved, and the fascinating journey from simple alerts to the sophisticated notification systems we use today.
Neovim for DevOps Engineers: From SSH Terminals to Full Development
A comprehensive guide to why Neovim is the superior editor for DevOps work. Master remote development, infrastructure-as-code workflows, minimal dependencies, and why traditional IDEs fail in SSH environments. Learn the mental model of why Neovim beats VS Code and JetBrains when you're managing infrastructure.